## Tuesday, June 24, 2008

### tribal art? modern art? look and see

one of the many irritating things about the presentation of tribal' art in western museums is precisely the implication of tribal'.

what a complete lack of self-reflection. as if our society is not tribal. as if our medieval and much of our other-periods' art is not religious / shamanistic even.

but even on the aesthetic level, the difference in appreciation can be stunning to behold. i repeat the picture from the previous post, below. and i ask you: is this sculpture not in every sense more balanced, more provoking, more evoking than eg. any of giacometti's works? do you not think that most modern' sculptors would have given an arm and a leg to have a form sense as profound as in this statuette?

man, wood, african, 19-20th century (did not write down the details, sorry)

alberto giacometti, sitting man (or something like that, did not write down the details, sorry), centre pompidou

so why don't we see any african art in the centre pompidou? or other tribal' art? could it be that although we are supposedly in the 21st century, we are still as bigoted as our 19th century forebears? could it be we are still droogstoppels, only covering up?

#### 1 comment:

x said...

As your post about Kwaaknijd; how postmodernism can have a new styleword purism or simplism, just enough to express, nothing more nothing less, the universal love (of art)